Sick, biased, judgements

Voyeuristic tendencies have brought about standards and opinions that have been prevalent nearly always, but also rose those that had clearly been kept in the closet for good reason. It's a provable fact that not every "social" course of action should be weighed in on... Let alone NEEDS to be. It's not always prudent to have a looker over your shoulder, maybe even more detrimental when it's a critical eye. 

Sex is a fun and faceted option for time that fulfills an array of issues, potentially even from core to surface, and it's a decision well made that kept confidentiality and discretion cloaking therapeutic endeavors. Somehow throughout battling wills in context for sexual gratification, we found those who have chosen to use sex as a platform covering respite, antagonistic, and stagnant reasons. The danger here is not only degrading the act itself, or our immediate return and gain from engaging in it, but warping the third party viewer, and allowing them to take away a dirtier opinion than most are comfortable with. But, considering the initial cause for utilization, is it really unfair that the light on the whole is shed with dimness? 

It's certainly known that sex has kept a poor reputation for decades unfortunately, but it's a shame that there's a whole other demographic besides the uber conservative or zealously religious attacking the same side, now policing our bedrooms and very nearly getting away with it. Somewhere a line needs to be drawn before we're literally having our very souls out for judgement, and by narrow minded peers or neighbors at that. In the mean time, the best we can do is to cherish each other, our allies and partners, and never forget that if it's not in the Constitution, it's likely an illness of character that we're beating, not just a cynical viewpoint, unfairly and misinformationally formed. Not a case the lucid forefathers ever expected any to build in, I bet.